SQUEEKY'S CORNER
To INF or Not to INF: Is There a Question?
Recently two of our mutual friends received very
exciting and encouraging results after treatment with
combination therapy with Interferon and Ribavirin. For
both Joan and Darlene, the treatment was not easy (see
"Adverse Events" on page 6); but despite very
strong side effects, both these gals persisted and feel
not only that it was worth it but that they would do it
again. In both cases, PCR was undetectable; in one case,
at 6 months, in the other, at the end of treatment. In
Joan's case, this was temporary; however, a subsequent
biopsy revealed that her liver damage had been
substantially reversed. (See "Interferon and
Ribavirin" on page 2 for discussion of PCR).
On the other hand, many people in the Hep C community
have taken the decision to seek alternative forms of
treatment and to eschew traditional approaches for a
variety of reasons ranging from the X-files conspiracy
theory of modern medicine to personal choices based
simply on unmanageable side effects, or prohibitive
costs. Some of these people have had varying success with
Western herbal treatment (milk thistle, dandelion,
artichoke, etc.) and others with Eastern approaches
(Ayurvedic and Chinese medicine). As the discussion
between Perry and Tim shows (See below) Chinese medicine
can greatly improve "quality of life", and is
often used as an adjunct to Interferon therapy to help
manage side-effects. But as Tim cautions, because there
is no necessary relation between symptomatology and
progression of disease, and because there are little or
no controls on alternative medicine, there is always the
risk of doing more damage to oneself in an attempt to
avoid the obvious damage that drugs such as Interferon
can induce.
What then is one to do?
It is often when one is confused by such complicated
choices that one can fall prey to the unscrupulous and
even dangerous practices that continue to dupe many of
the chronically ill. Warnings about quackery abound on
the internet (and can now be found posted on our very own
listserve), but even these are sometimes questionable and
seem to belie hidden agendas of their own. For example,
at the American Council on Science and Health site one
can find postings about Chinese Medicine, Therapeutic
Touch (see p. 5), and the like, which are clearly
intended to discredit. No pretence of rapprochement is
evident, and the language is clearly pejorative and
patronising.
If I were to read only the articles published in the
ACSH journal, I might think that Therapeutic Touch and
Chinese Medicine were pure bunk! After all, the journal
is official and its contributors often prestigious. But
then, both you and I know from personal experience that
many of these "unapproved" modalities have
provided relief from pain and improved quality of life
for both our friends and ourselves.
Like many with hepatitis C, I continue to take herbs
and to investigate alternative approaches. But I am also
scheduled to begin combination treatment with Interferon
and Ribavirin shortly, in the hope that my liver damage
can be reversed. Like Perry, I too feel that my
"quality" of life has been greatly ameliorated
through herbal and other non-standard treatments. But now
I must seriously consider the "quantity" of
life that lies before me.
C.D. Mazoff, Ph.D., Dip Th.